Thursday, March 3, 2011

Brazilian Wax How Often

IN GABON, A CHAIR morally unacceptable



is in the "Social Contract" by Jean-Jacques Rousseau questioned the political legitimacy in terms of power. For him, the political legitimacy of a leader is defined as the executive power conferred by the general will of the electorate. Gabon applied to the case, this definition is Ali Bongo someone totally illegitimate and whose power is based on only one gives, that is to say, the institutionalization of force. Anyone familiar with the workings of power Bongo admit without really being forced, at the basis of its rationale, is a direct relationship between access to highly paid positions of responsibility, and personal allegiance to an individual. So there is no concept here of state. It does not do its work so that the rayon Gabon, Omar Bongo, but meet for 42 years and his son during X years he intends to govern Gabon until death ensues and his son comes to his turn with new slogans. In the absence of popular legitimacy, a sense of national community is replaced by the instrumentation and social policy of ethnicity.

1. As time passes, the less the Gabon are
The least we can say today is that national feeling is the latrine in our country. While many believed had the idea of Gabon 50 years ago, it is clear that in their hearts, this idea is now broken. Even among those who cry out to us emergence day long, do not rely on appearances, they do so only to satisfy the needs of flattery because they know the prince will thus their livelihood. If they did not cry all day long was emerging, they find that their replacements would double in decibels. It would So following a chase that would be most emerging. All this had nothing to do with Gabon, but everything to do with the principle of pleasing the prince. This should be a central unifying power of all of Gabon, is but a kaleidoscope of courtiers with a strong ethnic construction. This assembly is forged by establishing local authorities which are then deciphered in the policies of resource allocation on a tribal, ethnic and regional. The results are visible, what is the harvest? Who can say that it is abundant for Gabon? In this system, as in other regimes totalitarian turn is made to believe that in terms of policy, either you are with Ali Bongo, or you're a bad Gabon! In this system is the freedom of thinking is challenged, for between these two extremes, there is a range of opinions, which should help color the political existence of the country. But alas, the world sees things differently Bongo! For them, it is about to steal the freedom of individuals, and put in a straitjacket.

2. For the regime, particularly to reduce any independent structure capable of opposing him.
Question for emerging "we quote an autonomous structure, ie a political party, a company Gabonese Gabonese NGO, etc.., headed by people with political influence against the current regime, which exists without difficulties in Gabon? Dear readers, this is not a coincidence that any elite or potentially competitive structure, must be eliminated. Only have a right to survive, individuals or interest groups that favor the glorification of power Bongo, where a strategy of cooptation of elements that can tamtam breathlessly for the prince, and a radical struggle against those who insist to oppose the power or whose interests conflict with him. Here on this blog why we continue to say that such a regime is morally unacceptable as offering only the same old recipes to Gabon. Recipe for which we already know the pitiful results. We find it totally unacceptable that an unelected regime agrees to restrict individual freedoms, revising the constitution to allow the icon of the emerging keep life at the head of the country, as well as establishing a state Except where arbitrary arrest and information control are standard. No, this country and we reject this plan.

To govern a country, there can be, over time, a policy that is legitimate and responsible: a balanced policy. That is why in countries with mature democracies that have developed the concepts right and left, all the governments of left and right who succeed tend to govern the center. It is not by chance or by loss of sense of direction. Instead, it is the recognition that political legitimacy is at the center and not at the extremes. It was around this magnetic force accountability and legitimacy, that also want to go to Gabon. That is to say to a country and a balanced power and non-family. All observers, even a little lucid in Gabonese politics, returning to the profound imbalance in the country. So why insist on having the power of people who offer and irresponsible policies that divide the community so that the country would benefit from creating a leadership with a responsible and legitimate political thought? Instead of genuine political development, we made a policy based on the syndrome of "Father Christmas", that is to say, the policy of "emergence", which is nothing other than series of proposals clientelist Populists and the establishment of heaven on earth tomorrow in Gabon, with little effort and want to exalt the people but also at their most flattering material. Having too much without getting tired, "that still attracts many courtiers. Porter political legitimacy in a representative democracy, is a mission that requires responsible behavior. And that the Bongo can not.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Boxer Shorts Days Of The Week

hurt BEHALF OF THE EMERGENCE. Adversarial INVERSION IS DOING WELL IN GABON

A parallel government ministers to go in the basements of the security services.



tyranny which ruled Gabon and monopolizes most of his wealth, has now decided to punish severely any expression of objectivity does not fit with the emerging environment. These "believers" good and crazy "emergence", we invented the legal expertise of the inversion adversarial, that is to say, the principle that, for the good of "emergence" we must do evil, as the utopian "emerging" Gabonese promises a "Disneyland" in 2025. In this fairy tale, any idea contrary to orthodoxy, not only will be accused of bad faith, but give credence to the emerging crisis, which will be problematic for the individual disagreeing.

1) It will steal your votes, but if you complain, you hit it and you are forced to choose either the continuous harassment, or you can join the side.
The inversion is an adversarial principle whereby one authority, power or entity, to accuse his victims for purposes of intimidation and to better create these victims, a sense of fear and weakness. Through this behind the scenes, the power "emerge" from Ali Bongo has become immune against any possible critical look at itself and project its flaws on others, that is to say, especially on its victims. The inversion adversary wants the master is always right. In Gabon it means: "The Bongo are always right, even when they are wrong, they are always right." We have seen a reversal in Port Gentil when adversarial, Rogombe Rose said that it is people from elsewhere who have marched through the town, although he knew very well that the people of this city had expressed their dissatisfaction Following the hold-up Mborantsoit. We have also seen where it has been speculated that mercenaries from Port-Gentil came from Equatorial Guinea to come destabilize Gabon, while it is indeed the militia of Ali Bongo, who kill people in the streets of Port-Gentil. So still more screaming, we are seeing, when the self proclaimed Mba Obame is considered illegal under the law enacted by Mborantsuo, while that of Ali Bongo is considered perfectly legal but totally fraudulent. It is very funny to hear emerging yesterday taxed Mamboundou and his supporters all the names of birds, not to swear by the civility and generosity of spirit of the latter, since he eats now open Ali Bongo's table. It is of course, you'll understand the pure comedy.

2) Decide on an alternative vision of Gabon and the offer is liable to a summons to appear before instances of power stasiennes
Those who have decided that there will never Gabon reversal of roles. Those who feel the same they will never be citizens like any other and that the power of their hereditary right, do not support any proposal from any other Gabon, but then there, not at all. Thus only for purposes of intimidation, the power of Gabon has decided to hear government ministers Mba Obame. What will they say power? He cut their wages? This is already done. That their party is dissolved? This is already done. They are removed from public office? This is already done. What will they tell the power individually and collectively? Nothing more, if not physically threatening and include their families for good measure. Except that once again the champions of the emergence we do not hit the "dialogue", which lent itself well say that these people have been convened in the basements of the security services of Ali Bongo in order to start a dialogue "constructive" with them to resolve the crisis. No, a dictatorship do not dialogue, it dictates and he is obeyed, period. When a dictatorship says he wants to discuss is that it means you dictate the line. What can we please discuss with a power that tramples the golden rule of any democracy is the vote citizen? Discuss that with a regime that clearly and arrogance of the upstart, regularly exceed the tolerable limits of acceptability.

Is this wind of revolt underlying Gabon, which is both our quiver in power, and gives rise to even more paranoia? It's enough to laugh when we see and perceive the distress that are employed by leaders of our sorry state "democratic" when in politics, some think that the games will be made for all eternity ... for them and that others will suffer eternally.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

High Metabolism Bowel Movements

Gaddafi's Libya AS OF GABON BONGO; GOVERNANCE BASED ON THE TRIBE